Intertoobs
Wednesday 15. July 2009 — 17:39“A series of pipes.”
My dad has been hosting his origami site at Geocities for the past several years. I spoke to him yesterday about acquiring a domain name and self hosting the site as Geocities—presently owned and operated by Yahoo—will close its electronic doors very soon. He will move from there to a self-hosted site with its own independent address, which is inherently better because of greater control over the back-end of things. He rightly said that this was a good thing anyway, because this is how we keep these things—websites, the Internet—alive. This started me thinking about the Internet and how different a place it is from when I first started using it over a decade ago.
Thinking about Geocities in particular made me a bit reminiscent about all of the one-off, special interest sites that sprang up in the late 1990s. Usenet aside, you could find almost any information—be it quality or not—in single column pages with colored text and often over a bright—sometimes obnoxious—background. In those days, the big Internet companies had sites that were complex, multi-column affairs with boxes and ads, but the real Internet was the domain of the people writing whatever they wanted in center-aligned pages.
It was a great time to be a conspiracy theorist. Or really into Wicca.
Searching the Internet in the 90s was fantastic and weird. Democracy at its finest. All things change with time, some for worse some for better. There are reasonable arguments in either direction for the changes evident in the Internet over the last decade and a half. For some applications, the Internet has made life easier, obviously. Communication is fantastic. I live in Egypt and communicate with friends readily all over the world in an inexpensive and effective way. This is due to greater ubiquity of broadband Internet coverage in Egypt and elsewhere.
Websites have also become easier to create and maintain. I use Wordpress to generate this site and have been for several years. The first version of the site, however, was written in PHP by yours truly. It was an exercise in basics which has made working with and customizing Wordpress much easier for me in subsequent years. That said, it is really easy now to have a site that looks more or less professional, and everyone does. The downside is that now everything on the Internet seems to be a blog and sites grow stagnant as soon as the writer gets a book deal—which seems inevitable for many upstart bloggers these days.
The information which used to be so readily available on the Internet is now relegated to the All Thing1 of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is a great tool as a first-reference: it democratizes basic reference, particularly for those who already have experience with traditional encyclopedias. It also contains vastly more information on a much wider variety of topics than do traditional encyclopedias. That said, it is still only a first reference, and the “peer-review” to which the information is subjected to is conducted by experts and non-experts alike.
My brother and I grew up with a set—two actually—of encyclopedia in the house. It was a great first- or quick-reference for almost anything that we wondered about or were writing about for school. As I got older and learned more about doing research, the references and bibliography proved perfect guides to more and deeper information on a given topic. That was how it was done.
The Internet changed all that. I cannot count the times that I heard college professors tell students that they had to use books and journal articles rather than online references. I was always confused. Did college students really not know how to use a library? It turns out that, no, they did—and do—not. Library usage seems to be, more and more, a thing of the past. The library at my present University is not expanding its collection very rapidly because they are exploring electronic alternatives—none of which work very well.
We used to go to the library with my mom almost every weekend. We had library cards by the time we were six or seven years old. I was—and am still—an avid reader because of this level of access to books. I am like a ship without a rudder—or more aptly, a ship without water—when I have no access to a library. This is not to say that I do not now primarily access academic journals via the Internet while conducting research. I do. It is easier, and saves me the time of sifting through stacks of journals in the basement in order to photocopy endless pages from them. This is an improvement.
Additionally, Google Books and the Internet Archive are becoming ever more useful resources for finding out-of-print and public-domain works written before the current copyright cutoff. They do not, however, replace the public or research library. Instances of false information being reported elsewhere in the media based on a Wikipedia article as an authoritative source are a good argument for returning to more rigorous forms of research on the part of journalists and academics alike.
Also, the above-mentioned one-off specialist sites seem to be going by the wayside as the Internet evolves into an archive of photoshopped pictures of cats and funny/stupid things. It used to be the case that the top of the search engine output would be a number of websites with a vast amount of—potentially questionable—data on almost any topic.
Now, on the other hand, Wikipedia is at the top of the list for almost anything that you can search for. That is unless you are accustomed to advance searching and particularly adept at using keywords. Most of the students who I help at the reference desk are not. They typically begin their research by going to Google and typing their topic or a full sentence (e.g. – “Mongolia” or “why is there domestic violence in the middle east?.” These are two recent examples of searches which students were having trouble with). To get to much of the real information that is available on the Internet these days you have to sift through hundreds of entries in blogs or advertisements. Monetizing the Internet proves to be primarily a tool for obfuscating it rather than improving user-as-content-generator experience.
This is one of the primary reasons that I am an advocate of net-neutrality and online rights—including, but not limited to, file-sharing, digitized books, and un-filtered/un-traffic-shaped Internet service, not to mention open-source/open-licensing. The Internet has the potential to be a tool for posterity, and indeed it is already serving us in this manner to some degree. It has the potential to be so much more. The moment that corporate interests became more important than the needs of Internet users, the system broke. It will limp though, but it will not recover fully and become the repository of information that it should be until corporate money-making interests are set aside.
This will not happen anytime soon, and indeed, Yahoo’s decision to discontinue Geocities in order to promote their new web-hosting platform—which is pay to play—is a step in the wrong direction. The Internet is not about closing things down in order that they might not be in conflict with business interests: it is about information being freely and readily available the world over and even beyond. This used to be a purpose of libraries as well.
It seems, however, that we have lost sight of this, lulled into contented complacence by cute pictures of talking cats and repositories of awkward family photos. This does not bode well at all. It will eventually change, though. Economies and finance online are not, and never have been stable. The one thing that is stable at this stage is the ability of one computer to connect to another. As long as we have that, when the corporate hegemony Internet collapses, we will simply start over, one node at a time.
Until then, if anyone needs me I’ll be reading online comics and looking at pictures of sandwiches.
———
1 A reference to the progeny of the blogosphere presented in Dan Simmons’ Hyperion and Endymion.
RSS
Subscribe
Glossary
Donate
E-mail Me
you have put into words exactly the same things i have grumbled about for a while now haha thanks john
Great article John. It isn't only the commercialization of the internet it is all the gadgets and apps. I don't need all that crap…I don't want all that crap. It's flashy and dazzling, but how much dose it really add to the internet experience? In fact it remind me of my experience with AOL. I felt AOL was directing me to what it wanted me to see or find, not what I was looking for. I cancel it and subscribed to GFN (Genesee Free Net) and I felt freed. It is a simple direct connection to the internet. I still have it for $5 a month, so that it might survive and in the hope that it will go to a high speed service some day. For most of what I do on the internet I use an alternate higher speed service, an air card for my laptop. For me it is great. I can't get DSL at my location and I WON'T use Comcast.
As to my Geocities site, I am sad to see it go. When yahoo bought it out a few years ago, it changed terribly. But it was still there, now it will be gone. Another simple and good idea flushed down the tube. So, I have purchased a domain. It is something I have been wanting to do for some time. That's a good thing for me and it is a great opportunity to re- build my web page.
But, here is the…But…
After setting up a hosting account, with GoDaddy, I couldn't build my site the way I wanted. The file manager had to many gadgets running in the back ground and it keep freezing on me. I know there are apps and other things that will do everything for, but I want to use html and a file manager. That is what I know and that is what I want to do. I have the time and I enjoy the challenge. I was so frustrated by the end of the day, I closed the hosting account. The very nice young lady that I talked to at GoDaddy, put all in perspective for me. When I explained to her that I could not use the file manager to edit my html. Her response was,
"Why!!!! do you want to do that".
I though hmmmm, "Because that is what I want to do"
So, I found another hosting site, JustHosting.com. It is simple, easy to use, cheaper, has all the apps (if I what to us them) and more. Best of all the file manager and html editor works. Thank you JustHosting.
Well John, there might sill be hope. We (you, I and the like) will have to look farther and keep on keeping on.
Dad